Forensics boston bombing

However, three days after the attacks, the FBI was able to release pictures of the two suspects, brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. How was it that these two were found within a sea of thousands of faces? Within hours after the bombings, law enforcement agencies were requesting any and all digital evidence available; not only from security surveillance footage from buildings and stores near the bombings, but from still pictures and video taken by private citizens as well.

The public responded. In fact, three FBI forensics facilities across the country were working on analyzing the audio and video materials. We want to look for people meandering in a strange way. Taking pictures, taking measurements. It was these forensics tactics that allowed the FBI to identify the suspects. If the video proves inconclusive, there are other ways to figure out what happened.

One main question is whether it was a suicide bombing or a remote-control device. Re-creating the injuries will help determine the direction of the shrapnel, and help locate the epicenters of the devices—and that means detailing injuries to living victims and examining the deceased, he says. Human bodies that are hit by shrapnel have evidence in their bodies. All that information should be chronicled by investigators, on the scene, in the hospital and morgue. Residue of explosions needs to be collected and sent to the lab—devices can be tested in the field for their composition, but residue cannot, Thurman says.

He cautions not to be too hasty in assessing blame. This could have been anybody. Type keyword s to search. In other words, a thriller terrorist story was orchestrated to make certain the public saw the brothers as dangerous terrorists. I covered the story at length on my website see for example August 17, John Remington Graham saw that the brothers were being quickly convicted in the media, which raised the question whether media conviction was substituting for the lack of evidence.

After 8. Supreme Court. John Remington Graham, an experienced prosecutor and defense attorney filed an argument for friends of the court before the U.

Supreme Court, pointing out that the trial of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ignored the exculpatory evidence that was never heard and proved him not guilty. Tsarnaev, was never called to the attention of the jury at trial, was left unmentioned by counsel on both sides, and was ignored by the presiding judge when the sentence of death was imposed.